twitter google

Random Rant: Leave UFC 78 alone!

The rumored card for UFC 78 on Nov. 17 in Newark, NJ has been posted several times on FiveOuncesOfPain.com and thus far the responses haven’t been all that positive. But I need to speak up because I beg to differ; while the rumored card currently lacks star power, it’s still a strong card nonetheless.

The match with the most appeal to me is Spencer Fisher vs. Frankie Edgar. Both have already participated in match of the year candidates (Edgar vs. Tyson Griffin at UFC 67 and Fisher vs. Sam Stout at UFC Fight Night 10) and because their styles could mesh well, you have the potential for another match of the year candidate for both fighters.

It appears talks between Hayato Sakurai and the UFC have broken down as Sakurai is scheduled to fight in Japan but the UFC has found a suitable opponent for Karo Parisyan in Hector Lombard. Lombard, who represented Cuba in the Olympics in Judo, is 11-2-1 in MMA and has competed for promotions such as PRIDE and DEEP.

By putting Parisyan vs. Lombard, UFC matchmaker Joe Silva is throwing two world class Judokas together in a match that will be extremely competitive. Parisyan, who is a tad small for welterweight will be facing a fighter in Lombard who has competed at times as a middleweight. Will Karo be able to rag doll Lombard like he has so many of his other opponents? It will be interesting to find out.

Thiago Alves vs. Ryo Chonan is yet another strong matchup that’s been rumored for the card. If the UFC welterweight division wasn’t so backlogged then the bout’s outcome would have greater implications. However, who really needs implications? Just sit back and watch what looks to be another potential strong match.

Lombard and Chonan aren’t the only former PRIDE fighters that will be making their UFC debuts, as Akihiro Gono vs. Tamdan McCrory is expected to take place. While the match might not be televised, fans attending live could be in store for a surprise. Gono, 27-12-7, will be a tough test for the undefeated 20-year old.

Other rumored matches that could take place during the non-televised portion are Ed Herman vs. David Terrell and Joe Lauzon vs. Jason Reinhardt. Lauzon is originally from Massachusetts so expect strong crowd support for him while Terrell vs. Herman is a match I can’t wait to see. The middleweight division in the UFC could use a shot to the arm and Terrell could be what the doctor ordered.

One of only two people to ever be promoted as a black belt in Jiu-Jitsu by Cesar Gracie, Terrell looked like a future star following his 24 second first round knockout over Matt Lindland at UFC 49 in 2004. Unfortunately, he’s been besieged by injuries and has fought just twice in the last three years. I’m looking forward to attending the show live and seeing first hand if Terrell is someone who can make an impact under the UFC’s current middleweight landscape.

If you’re one of the people who has chosen to use “sucks” as a way to describe the rumored lineup then I suggest you go to Netflix and start renting old PRIDE DVDs so that you can become more familiar with Lombard, Chonan, and Gono as well as some old UFC DVDs (i.e. UFC 49) to either introduce or re-introduce yourself to Terrell.

In regard to the lack of star power, have a little faith in Dana White and Silva. Tickets for UFC 78 go on sale to the general public this Saturday at 10 a.m. ET. The UFC wants to do well from a business perspective and it behooves them to deliver a solid main event. Rumors persist that we could see a rematch between Tito Ortiz and Rashad Evans but if Ortiz is playing hardball or his back is still not ready, then the UFC will come up with something else. Rumors about a match between Ortiz and Dan Henderson have been debunked but it appears as though the idea was at least explored. If Ortiz can’t be secured and Henderson is ready to go, then why not a match between Henderson and Evans?

On paper, UFC 78 might end up not having a lot of sex appeal but didn’t we learned from UFC 73 and UFC Fight Night 10 this year? It’s all about matchups and UFC 73 taught us that just because you have a bunch of big names all on a card, it doesn’t mean you’re going to see good matches if the fighters’ respective styles don’t mesh well. Meanwhile, UFN 10 showed us not to underestimate a card just because it doesn’t have a big name.

So please, leave UFC 78 alone!

10 COMMENTS
  • JL says:

    It’s a terrible card. I get almost every single pvp. The only one I skipped in the last year was the Ireland card because it was just as bad. I’m not sure I’d get it if they added Ortiz and Henderson since I don’t see anything else very interesting. If its Ortiz-Evans, then I will pass since the first fight was dreadful.

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Jeremy says:

    I think you have to have the star power on a PPV card though for it to be considered a good card. That’s what people are paying their hard earned money for. And is why I understand when people get upset about this card and cards like it. People complain because they want to see fights like Fisher-Edgar, but they don’t want to pay $40 dollars to do it.

    I do think it’s a solid card so far of fights though Sam. And they will probably be very entertaining fights as the styles and fighters seem to matchup well. And yes, some of the cards that don’t look good on paper UFN 10 and even UFC 69 were pretty good cards, so the people who are going to get the card certainly shouldn’t be going in thinking they are just wasting their money away. But they should have a better main draw on their card, especially when they are going to the NYC metro area for the first time in a while.

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Sam Caplan says:

    Jeremy:

    I don’t think they intend to go in with a main event of Fisher vs. Edgar. We’ll see at least one more major match added. The question is, do you feel Evans vs. Ortiz or Ortiz vs. Henderson or Henderson vs. Evans are worthy main events.

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Jeremy says:

    I didn’t mean to say if I did that Fisher-Edgar was the main event. Just the most anticipated fight right now. Like you mentioned it’s a fight of the year candidate right now. My feeling from what I have read from other posters around the MMA world is that none of the proposed main events for this show has really peaked their interest. And that’s why they have been down on this card. You have some good solid fights but no main event fight that people are interested in.

    Maybe a good poll question for the site would be what fight would people like to see of UFC 78? The three you mentioned or something else?

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Dan Cruickshank says:

    The difference between a bad UFN card and ends being good and a bad PPV card UFC ending up being good is $40. So no, I won’t leave this card alone just on the chance that it might good. Henderson vs Evans is almost more appealing to me than Ortiz vs Evans but either way I’m not willing to pay to see the rematch. Evans is the problem for me, he’s Keith Jardine-esque. I don’t believe he’s in the top 10 @ 205 and he couldn’t even take Tito who might not be in the top 10 either. On paper this the least spectacular card I’ve seen. It’s a $40 UFN card. As a fan, it makes me resent the UFC actually.

    I don’t think they would, but I’d almost suggest cancelingl the PPV and respecting the UFC brand they’ve worked so hard to build as though it stands for something… like quality.

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • They need something good for a headlining bout. But since Rich Franklin vs Yushin Okami headlined UFC72 I’ve lost faith in the UFC always putting a good card together. On a business side I understand : I’m sure they want the card to be good too.

    As a hardcore fan there’s tons of fights on the card that i’m excited to see, and matches which will definately be entertaining. But a card without a main event is just that: it doesn’t have a main event. And that’s lame.

    Oh, and Tito / Rashad 2 is a lame main event. The first match was a snoozefest and Rashad was clearly outmatched.

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • defsteve says:

    Michael Bisping vs Rashad Evans

    http://www.ufc.com/index.cfm?fa=eventDetail.FightCard&eid=958

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • […] Read Sam Caplan’s rant on quality this fight card HERE […]

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • Steve89 says:

    Henderson would give Rashad all he could handle. Henderson should be concentrating more towards an eventual unification bout with the winner of Rich Franklin/Anderson Silva 2. He’s still has the pride middleweight title and that should warrant him as the next opponent to battle the winner of UFC77. “Who’s the best?”…ring any bells?

    There is nothing wrong with the ufc featuring some of the lesser known fighters at a ppv. That’s how experience is earned and there’s a difference between fighting on Fight Night and at a PPV. Dana and crew are always looking for ways to expand the ufc’s visibility and by featuring up and coming fighters shows there is opportunity for growth and for making names of these lesser knowns. Lesser knowns of today are the champions of tomorrow.

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • […] Read Sam Caplan’s rant on quality this fight card HERE […]

    Agree or Disagree: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

LEAVE A COMMENT!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow 5OZ