<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Josh Koscheck vs. Dustin Hazelett a Possibility for UFC 82</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/27/josh-koscheck-vs-dustin-hazelett-a-possibility-for-ufc-82/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/27/josh-koscheck-vs-dustin-hazelett-a-possibility-for-ufc-82/</link>
	<description>Your Destination for Insider MMA News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grape Knee High</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/27/josh-koscheck-vs-dustin-hazelett-a-possibility-for-ufc-82/comment-page-1/#comment-7050</link>
		<dc:creator>Grape Knee High</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/27/josh-koscheck-vs-dustin-hazelett-a-possibility-for-ufc-82/#comment-7050</guid>
		<description>Should be a great fight, but I have to lean towards Kos here unfortunately.  I think Kos will come in with his &quot;Diego&quot; gameplan and keep it standing.  Is Hazelett&#039;s wrestling good enough to get the fight to the ground?  Probably not, which means if it&#039;s on the ground it&#039;s because Kos wants to be there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should be a great fight, but I have to lean towards Kos here unfortunately.  I think Kos will come in with his &#8220;Diego&#8221; gameplan and keep it standing.  Is Hazelett&#8217;s wrestling good enough to get the fight to the ground?  Probably not, which means if it&#8217;s on the ground it&#8217;s because Kos wants to be there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: godzillad</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/27/josh-koscheck-vs-dustin-hazelett-a-possibility-for-ufc-82/comment-page-1/#comment-6980</link>
		<dc:creator>godzillad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 03:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/27/josh-koscheck-vs-dustin-hazelett-a-possibility-for-ufc-82/#comment-6980</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take Hazelett in this one. He is a giant Welterweight and has great submissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take Hazelett in this one. He is a giant Welterweight and has great submissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rashad #1</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/27/josh-koscheck-vs-dustin-hazelett-a-possibility-for-ufc-82/comment-page-1/#comment-6976</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashad #1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 03:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/27/josh-koscheck-vs-dustin-hazelett-a-possibility-for-ufc-82/#comment-6976</guid>
		<description>lol glad they give Kos a nice easy fight to get over that ass whippin he got from GSP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol glad they give Kos a nice easy fight to get over that ass whippin he got from GSP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Morgan</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/27/josh-koscheck-vs-dustin-hazelett-a-possibility-for-ufc-82/comment-page-1/#comment-6963</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/11/27/josh-koscheck-vs-dustin-hazelett-a-possibility-for-ufc-82/#comment-6963</guid>
		<description>Dustin &quot;McLovin&quot; Hazelett FTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dustin &#8220;McLovin&#8221; Hazelett FTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

