Comments on: Post-UFC 86 Press Conference Notes

By: deemanie

deemanie — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:15:32 +0000

Man,please forest did not win if u call leg kicks winning then, I guess he won look at rampage face and look at forest face.

By: Noah

Noah — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 05:52:26 +0000

Jake, you are right, Rampage was not robed. I didn’t see him wearing a robe. Also, Rampage was not robbed, it was a good fight but I gotta say that Forrest edged out the win.

By: jake

jake — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:54:33 +0000

C-los your pretty stupid if you think a guy won the fight just because his corner says so even if he has 20 years of experience so what rampage only hurt forrest once and when he did forrest regained guard and got right back to his feet but when griffin hurt rampage he dominated him he mounted him and was going for subs rampage couldnt do anything than when when rampage was on forrest rampage got caught in a triangle and he couldnt keep forrest down. Forrest landed more strikes with his punches and kicks so think what you want but griffin won that fight dont say rampage got robbed he talked trash the whole time building up to this fight and he couldnt finish him like he said and looks like rampage might have to find another trainer because juanito said if forrest wins he would retire FORREST GRIFFIN WON THAT FIGHT RAMPAGE WAS NOT ROBED.

By: C-los

C-los — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:18:45 +0000

Rampage did not lose that fight. If you know MMA, everyone should agree with this. He should get an automatic rematch and he’ll beat Griffin again. The UFC needs a white champion and Griffin is a popular fighter that the UFC can market. Jackson is not as marketable as Griffin is and tha’t why he got robbed. Jackson’s corner told him he did not lose, go to UFC.com and you will hear Junito (Jackson’s trainer) tell him that he did not lose. Junito has over 20 years of experience. The UFC is wack and I will not support it until they give Rampage the reamtch he deserves. One of the most notable fighters left UFC and his name is Randy Coutore…hint, hint. He left because UFc has become a market machine and there is no credibility in the sport anymore. Go to Elite xc, that is where is at now.

By: Anton K

Anton K — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:07:39 +0000

Cote earned a title shot? With that performace? This is getting ridiculous. Anderson Silva might just kill him.

By: Jackson vs Griffin Judges’ Scorecards; Immediate Rematch? If Not, What’s Next? UFC 86 Random Notes

Sun, 06 Jul 2008 18:18:06 +0000

[...] left the door open for it in the post-fight conference. Rampage wants a rematch. Forrest said he’d give him a rematch. A rematch would probably be [...]

By: ACK!

ACK! — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 17:56:04 +0000

Cote vs. Silva… Yuck. Who wants to watch that garbage?

By: MMAFan

MMAFan — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 16:11:20 +0000

Based on his performance last night, I would tell Patrick Cote that he does not deserve a title shot against Anderson Silva. And this comment comes from a fellow Canadian. Personally, I would favour a Jackson/Griffin rematch for the title before any other contenders vye for the belt. Last night’s fight was that close and difficult to score, as the flood of controversial responses to the decision continue to fill the comment pages of MMA websites.

By: DPK

DPK — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:10:44 +0000

Silva v Cote better be free, or be surrounded by a great card, I ain’t paying for that fight.

Rampage v Forrest II on the other hand will be a great fight, I just pretty sure someone else will jump in line first.

By: RUSH

RUSH — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:38:47 +0000

I’m a big Cote fan and I definitely don’t think he’s ready for Silva… put him in there with the winner of Bisping-Leben for the title shot