Comments on: Shane Carwin: Brock Lesnar ‘is a freaking liar’

By: Patrickk

Patrickk — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:50:09 +0000

Like Fred Durst of Limp Bizkit says

‘It’s all a bunch of he-say-she-say bull$h!t’

I bet it irritates Carwin that Brock is a moron.

Just keep that lunatic fringe mindframe when you fight Velasquez, and then take it out on Brock when you get the title shot.

Like or Dislike: 0 2

By: wilfish4774

wilfish4774 — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:57:04 +0000

By the way thanks to 5 ounces of pain for making it so easy to post messages. You really know how to treat the fans and thanks much for it.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: wilfish4774

wilfish4774 — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:54:16 +0000

If strength has anything to do with it Shane Carwin can’t win. Shane may be able to fool the majority but he cannot fool those who know that he does not have nearly the strength of Lesner. Does anyone really think that Shane can come into a fight with Lesner bulked up the way that he does for all of the shrimps that he fights. Speaking say just from a max bench press between Shane and Lesner I would have to say that Lesner has a 400 pound bench,, Shane might have a 325 pound max. And speaking in terms of the squat there is a 200 to 300 pound difference between Lesner and Shane. It is obvious that Shane is on some sort of bulking substance to make him look so impressive but insn’t it too bad that all that water weight could not be turned into strength>> There is a reason why Lesner is the champion and did not have to fight his way up. think about for a minute.

Like or Dislike: 1 6

By: Mbreckles49

Mbreckles49 — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:37:35 +0000

Ground N Pound posted that the Brock Lesnar interview was a FAKE. Someone hacked their security. Interesting development because Carwin talked shit on a fake comment.

Doesn’t any of these MMA Journalists check their sources before using portions of interviews?

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: MMA-LOGIC

MMA-LOGIC — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:09:32 +0000

I want somebody that can do more than punch and wrestle to kick both their asses.

Like or Dislike: 1 0

By: Jstew3785

Jstew3785 — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:04:26 +0000

Carwin didn’t earn a title shot until his victory over Gonzaga. You could make a case for Cain or Carwin. I say let them fight and determine the # 1 contender. I think that is the general consensus on most forums. Carwin will have the title sometime in 2010, just a prediction.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: kingsmasher

kingsmasher — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:27:29 +0000

Why hasnt Carwin got a shot at the title yet?

Thats easy!!! He needs a big tattoo on his chest…Its all marketing!!
Dam he needs a nickname at least!!!!

Like or Dislike: 1 0

By: edub

edub — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:50:07 +0000

1. Brock
2. Cain
3. Carwin

I just think Cain would get a late tko over Carwin for some reason, by just out maneuvering him til Carwin gets tired.

Like or Dislike: 0 1

By: sigmund

sigmund — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:35:17 +0000

i defiantly think carwin would destroy lesnar and don’t see why he hasn’t earned his shot yet. the guy’s 11-0 and hasn’t had a fight go halfway through the first round yet. what more could you ask? he’s obviously got punching power and also an underrated ground game. I hope his time comes soon.

Like or Dislike: 1 0

By: Jstew3785

Jstew3785 — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:26:05 +0000

Yeah, and I don’t think Cain could get him on the ground. If he did, Carwin would probably bounce right back up. He outweighs him by 30lbs and is a lot stronger. I’d say they’re neck and neck in wrestling, but Carwin hits so hard he just hasn’t had to use it.

Like or Dislike: 0 0