<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nate Marquardt vs. Chael Sonnen set for UFC 110</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/</link>
	<description>Your Destination for Insider MMA News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMA-LOGIC</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132802</link>
		<dc:creator>MMA-LOGIC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132802</guid>
		<description>I am ANTI UFC COMPANY PRACTICES. But not anti UFC fighters. I also realize that if Aoki stays out of the UFC he will be able to fight Thomson, Sakurai, Melendez,  Alverez even Gomi etc. All of which are excellent fighters. You said ALL the good fighters are in the UFC. Your just naive dude cuz they aren&#039;t. Whats more they (being UFC LWs) have only fought each other and you HAVE NO IDEA HOW they would do against any of the non-UFC fighters. Unless you do know it all, but I doubt your ability to use the force or psychic ability to predict fight outcomes. &quot;Close minded&quot; rubbish I am completely aware of the UFCs talent pool but it seems unlike you I am also aware of the non-UFC talent pool and I know that it is impossible to judge fighters who would win between match ups like Aoki vs Florian or Fedor  vs Lesnar etc. 
What I said above is true The UFC will have to change and that Strikeforce has leap-frogged the UFC in more than 1 aspect. If that is anti UFC to you, what is not? saying the UFC is best at everything?. I obviously offended you when I pointed out that saying the UFC has all the best LW talent is wrong. Sorry but the truth hurts. The same kinda pain the UFC would feel if you...hugged their nuts to hard. Know what I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am ANTI UFC COMPANY PRACTICES. But not anti UFC fighters. I also realize that if Aoki stays out of the UFC he will be able to fight Thomson, Sakurai, Melendez,  Alverez even Gomi etc. All of which are excellent fighters. You said ALL the good fighters are in the UFC. Your just naive dude cuz they aren&#8217;t. Whats more they (being UFC LWs) have only fought each other and you HAVE NO IDEA HOW they would do against any of the non-UFC fighters. Unless you do know it all, but I doubt your ability to use the force or psychic ability to predict fight outcomes. &#8220;Close minded&#8221; rubbish I am completely aware of the UFCs talent pool but it seems unlike you I am also aware of the non-UFC talent pool and I know that it is impossible to judge fighters who would win between match ups like Aoki vs Florian or Fedor  vs Lesnar etc.<br />
What I said above is true The UFC will have to change and that Strikeforce has leap-frogged the UFC in more than 1 aspect. If that is anti UFC to you, what is not? saying the UFC is best at everything?. I obviously offended you when I pointed out that saying the UFC has all the best LW talent is wrong. Sorry but the truth hurts. The same kinda pain the UFC would feel if you&#8230;hugged their nuts to hard. Know what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMA-LOGIC</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132798</link>
		<dc:creator>MMA-LOGIC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132798</guid>
		<description>Honor I don&#039;t hate UFC fighters as I have said before the UFC does not cross promote it carries on like a two year old (Dana) and stops fights from happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honor I don&#8217;t hate UFC fighters as I have said before the UFC does not cross promote it carries on like a two year old (Dana) and stops fights from happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nope</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132657</link>
		<dc:creator>nope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132657</guid>
		<description>i like this fight....I smell upset</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like this fight&#8230;.I smell upset</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nope</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132656</link>
		<dc:creator>nope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132656</guid>
		<description>Does everyone forget that Fighters have to agree to their respective contracts? Sooo....If they sign the papers, they agree that they are worth that amount to fight each fight. If they did not agree that they worth as much or as little as they were offered, they probably wouldn&#039;t sign.

What i&#039;m saying is, they are apparently fine w/ what they are being paid...and so should you.

And if you&#039;re not, you should get the neccesary education and become a manager so you can negotiate better wages for these poor fighters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does everyone forget that Fighters have to agree to their respective contracts? Sooo&#8230;.If they sign the papers, they agree that they are worth that amount to fight each fight. If they did not agree that they worth as much or as little as they were offered, they probably wouldn&#8217;t sign.</p>
<p>What i&#8217;m saying is, they are apparently fine w/ what they are being paid&#8230;and so should you.</p>
<p>And if you&#8217;re not, you should get the neccesary education and become a manager so you can negotiate better wages for these poor fighters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edub</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132615</link>
		<dc:creator>edub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132615</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-132612&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-132612&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HonorableAggression&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Also, people often forget that sponsors pay fighters as much if not more than what the ufc does, its just not open-book like fighter salaries.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sponsors also pay the UFC now to sponsor fighters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-132612">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-132612" rel="nofollow">HonorableAggression</a></strong>: Also, people often forget that sponsors pay fighters as much if not more than what the ufc does, its just not open-book like fighter salaries.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Sponsors also pay the UFC now to sponsor fighters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edub</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132614</link>
		<dc:creator>edub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132614</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-132612&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-132612&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HonorableAggression&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: You’re not accounting for a great deal of expenses, including the entire ufc staff, the cost of putting on the live event, marketing, promotion, etc. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thats what the 20 mil was for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-132612">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-132612" rel="nofollow">HonorableAggression</a></strong>: You’re not accounting for a great deal of expenses, including the entire ufc staff, the cost of putting on the live event, marketing, promotion, etc.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Thats what the 20 mil was for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HonorableAggression</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132612</link>
		<dc:creator>HonorableAggression</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132612</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-132607&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-132607&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;edub&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: To Jgrose23: These are figures from UFC 100;It has been reported that the buys were from 1 million all the way to 1.5. Now if you multiply that by 49.95(not counting the hd 54.95 purchases) that comes out to 60 million dollars(giver or take obviously. Now give the cable companies the money we’ll say 10 million. Now take away for athletic commisions set up crew an all intangibles, we’ll say 20 million which is probably way too high. Take all that away and you still have 30 million dollars. Now Brocks cut of the ppv we’ll say 2 million just to be overly generous.Now the live gate that was reported on this very site at 5.12 million dollars.
You have roughly 34 million dollars after paying your star attraction. $2,208,000, including all bonuses was reported to the athletic commision. That is roughly 6 % of the profit of the event going to the fighters. That in my opinion is unacceptable, and needs to be changed.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re not accounting for a great deal of expenses, including the entire ufc staff, the cost of putting on the live event, marketing, promotion, etc. 

Also, people often forget that sponsors pay fighters as much if not more than what the ufc does, its just not open-book like fighter salaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-132607">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-132607" rel="nofollow">edub</a></strong>: To Jgrose23: These are figures from UFC 100;It has been reported that the buys were from 1 million all the way to 1.5. Now if you multiply that by 49.95(not counting the hd 54.95 purchases) that comes out to 60 million dollars(giver or take obviously. Now give the cable companies the money we’ll say 10 million. Now take away for athletic commisions set up crew an all intangibles, we’ll say 20 million which is probably way too high. Take all that away and you still have 30 million dollars. Now Brocks cut of the ppv we’ll say 2 million just to be overly generous.Now the live gate that was reported on this very site at 5.12 million dollars.<br />
You have roughly 34 million dollars after paying your star attraction. $2,208,000, including all bonuses was reported to the athletic commision. That is roughly 6 % of the profit of the event going to the fighters. That in my opinion is unacceptable, and needs to be changed.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re not accounting for a great deal of expenses, including the entire ufc staff, the cost of putting on the live event, marketing, promotion, etc. </p>
<p>Also, people often forget that sponsors pay fighters as much if not more than what the ufc does, its just not open-book like fighter salaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edub</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132607</link>
		<dc:creator>edub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132607</guid>
		<description>To Jgrose23: These are figures from UFC 100;

It has been reported that the buys were from 1 million all the way to 1.5. Now if you multiply that by 49.95(not counting the hd 54.95 purchases) that comes out to 60 million dollars(giver or take obviously. Now give the cable companies the money we&#039;ll say 10 million. Now take away for athletic commisions set up crew an all intangibles, we&#039;ll say 20 million which is probably way too high. Take all that away and you still have 30 million dollars. Now Brocks cut of the ppv we&#039;ll say 2 million just to be overly generous.  Now the live gate that was reported on this very site at 5.12 million dollars.
You have roughly 34 million dollars after paying your star attraction. $2,208,000, including all bonuses was reported to the athletic commision. That is roughly 6 % of the profit of the event going to the fighters. That in my opinion is unacceptable, and needs to be changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Jgrose23: These are figures from UFC 100;</p>
<p>It has been reported that the buys were from 1 million all the way to 1.5. Now if you multiply that by 49.95(not counting the hd 54.95 purchases) that comes out to 60 million dollars(giver or take obviously. Now give the cable companies the money we&#8217;ll say 10 million. Now take away for athletic commisions set up crew an all intangibles, we&#8217;ll say 20 million which is probably way too high. Take all that away and you still have 30 million dollars. Now Brocks cut of the ppv we&#8217;ll say 2 million just to be overly generous.  Now the live gate that was reported on this very site at 5.12 million dollars.<br />
You have roughly 34 million dollars after paying your star attraction. $2,208,000, including all bonuses was reported to the athletic commision. That is roughly 6 % of the profit of the event going to the fighters. That in my opinion is unacceptable, and needs to be changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HonorableAggression</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132606</link>
		<dc:creator>HonorableAggression</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132606</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-132569&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-132569&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MMA-LOGIC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: “think about as you say UFC is going to get over taken”
I didn’t say that at all I said they will have to change and they have some catching up to do (network deal etc). They are “over taken” in a few aspects and I believe they will have to change to keep up or stay ahead. We will both have to wait and see.“In fact the only division that SF has two of the top 10 fighters in the world is HW,”Misaki, Lawler, Hendo? are top candidates surely. Aoki, Thomson, Diaz, Fedor, Overeem, Mousasi etc and they are signing quickly. This is what I’m saying they are taking off and have a good relationship with Dream and M1 and also look like they are willing to deal with Sengoku. This is all more than what the UFC is doing.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You run around calling people like me ufc-focused because I think they have the best fighters (whatever you think about zuffa, most of the best are in the ufc, sorry), yet I still love watching other orgs and their talent. Its starting to look to me like you&#039;re the one who&#039;s narrow-minded since all you ever say is how the ufc sucks. It&#039;s like the counter-trend to hate ufc and people who like it now, and its just as lame as mindlessly adoring ufc.

As far as the fight, I agree with what a lot of you are saying, Chael is a game opponent but Nate will seriously destroy him, and I honestly hate Nate. They could power the stadium on his sense of self-satisfaction, but what can I say? The guy is a ridiculous opponent.

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-132592&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-132592&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fanoftna33&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: The ufc really wanted Silva vs Silva and if Wanderlei got past Nate then they can give him a title shot and who would question it. On the other hand if Nate wins the he has proven without a doubt he deserves the next shot.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I would question it. Wanderlei doesn&#039;t deserve a contender fight at MW yet, I love the guy but look at his recent ufc record, compare it to Nate&#039;s, and tell me how he deserves a shot like Nate does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-132569">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-132569" rel="nofollow">MMA-LOGIC</a></strong>: “think about as you say UFC is going to get over taken”<br />
I didn’t say that at all I said they will have to change and they have some catching up to do (network deal etc). They are “over taken” in a few aspects and I believe they will have to change to keep up or stay ahead. We will both have to wait and see.“In fact the only division that SF has two of the top 10 fighters in the world is HW,”Misaki, Lawler, Hendo? are top candidates surely. Aoki, Thomson, Diaz, Fedor, Overeem, Mousasi etc and they are signing quickly. This is what I’m saying they are taking off and have a good relationship with Dream and M1 and also look like they are willing to deal with Sengoku. This is all more than what the UFC is doing.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You run around calling people like me ufc-focused because I think they have the best fighters (whatever you think about zuffa, most of the best are in the ufc, sorry), yet I still love watching other orgs and their talent. Its starting to look to me like you&#8217;re the one who&#8217;s narrow-minded since all you ever say is how the ufc sucks. It&#8217;s like the counter-trend to hate ufc and people who like it now, and its just as lame as mindlessly adoring ufc.</p>
<p>As far as the fight, I agree with what a lot of you are saying, Chael is a game opponent but Nate will seriously destroy him, and I honestly hate Nate. They could power the stadium on his sense of self-satisfaction, but what can I say? The guy is a ridiculous opponent.</p>
<blockquote cite="comment-132592">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-132592" rel="nofollow">fanoftna33</a></strong>: The ufc really wanted Silva vs Silva and if Wanderlei got past Nate then they can give him a title shot and who would question it. On the other hand if Nate wins the he has proven without a doubt he deserves the next shot.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I would question it. Wanderlei doesn&#8217;t deserve a contender fight at MW yet, I love the guy but look at his recent ufc record, compare it to Nate&#8217;s, and tell me how he deserves a shot like Nate does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fanoftna33</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132592</link>
		<dc:creator>fanoftna33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132592</guid>
		<description>I think if the ufc wants to put on fights that people want to see and not protect certian fighters they could have made a much better match up, like Marquadt vs Wanderlei and had Akayame take on Sonnen. The ufc really wanted Silva vs Silva and if Wanderlei got past Nate then they can give him a title shot and who would question it. On the other hand if Nate wins the he has proven without a doubt he deserves the next shot.
Akayame vs Sonnen makes sense as Akayama has only had 1 fight here and the ufc needs to build up his following here a bit more, giving him a solid fighter like Sonnen would help, or if Sonnen were to win then its three in a row, and he now deserves a top 5 opponent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if the ufc wants to put on fights that people want to see and not protect certian fighters they could have made a much better match up, like Marquadt vs Wanderlei and had Akayame take on Sonnen. The ufc really wanted Silva vs Silva and if Wanderlei got past Nate then they can give him a title shot and who would question it. On the other hand if Nate wins the he has proven without a doubt he deserves the next shot.<br />
Akayame vs Sonnen makes sense as Akayama has only had 1 fight here and the ufc needs to build up his following here a bit more, giving him a solid fighter like Sonnen would help, or if Sonnen were to win then its three in a row, and he now deserves a top 5 opponent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manny</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132589</link>
		<dc:creator>manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132589</guid>
		<description>Are you serious? This is a 7 sec KO for nate. Boring fight. UFc match makers suk. UFC has a problem w MW class, WW, class and now LW class. No one really deserves a shot at the belt, if they do, they really DON&#039;T have a chance to win. Swick or Hadry will get destroyed by GSP, Silva will best belfort and nate, and after the rematch between shogun, machida will win and whos left at 205? besides rampage? UFC is giving ttile shots to fighters who do not deserve the in the ring for the belt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you serious? This is a 7 sec KO for nate. Boring fight. UFc match makers suk. UFC has a problem w MW class, WW, class and now LW class. No one really deserves a shot at the belt, if they do, they really DON&#8217;T have a chance to win. Swick or Hadry will get destroyed by GSP, Silva will best belfort and nate, and after the rematch between shogun, machida will win and whos left at 205? besides rampage? UFC is giving ttile shots to fighters who do not deserve the in the ring for the belt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edub</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132583</link>
		<dc:creator>edub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132583</guid>
		<description>4th Also Sonnen is a great fighter but he is in a crap matchup with Nate. Both have stellar wrestling with Sonnen the higher credentials. Nates game is way to diverse for Chael. Both his last opponents were ground centric fighters with Miller having the more diverse game off his back and okami having the better top game. Chaels matchup with Miller was very surprising because he has been prone to the sub. His fight with Okami I dont think was surprising at all considering he has fought at a higher weight class in the past and when Okami cant force his will he doesnt win.

This fight is obviously a higher caliber fight than the sf mw fight, and i hated on the sf matchup when it was announced but shields is no slouch. It should be noted that the last three MWS Shields has beat is Okami, lawler, and Miller. All perenial top ten mws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4th Also Sonnen is a great fighter but he is in a crap matchup with Nate. Both have stellar wrestling with Sonnen the higher credentials. Nates game is way to diverse for Chael. Both his last opponents were ground centric fighters with Miller having the more diverse game off his back and okami having the better top game. Chaels matchup with Miller was very surprising because he has been prone to the sub. His fight with Okami I dont think was surprising at all considering he has fought at a higher weight class in the past and when Okami cant force his will he doesnt win.</p>
<p>This fight is obviously a higher caliber fight than the sf mw fight, and i hated on the sf matchup when it was announced but shields is no slouch. It should be noted that the last three MWS Shields has beat is Okami, lawler, and Miller. All perenial top ten mws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edub</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132582</link>
		<dc:creator>edub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132582</guid>
		<description>Ok let me clarify on some of the points i made earlier because I think they are being taken into the wrong way.
1st. SF is not anywhere near the UFC yet. But they need only offer up one thing to start making up ground on the UFC. Profit sharing. If the fights on CBS start to net big money deals than thats where the future will be. I personally souldnt mind it at all considering it would be free. Although SF would probably move over to ppv eventually.
2nd. Im not saying the UFC should stop trying to make money for themselves. I would just like to see them pay these guys a higher percentage of profits. Its been said many times before but the UFC&#039;s profit sharing with its atheletes is abissmal compared to the other major sports leagues. If the UFC spent 1 million dollars more per event on its fighters I dont think it would hurt them too much. Although I do not know the ppv averages off the top of my head. 
3rd. If Dan is taking this stand then I applaud him. Im not sure he is right if he is insisting on 500gs per fight, but it should prove a point. Frank Mir was paid 40000 for his fight with Brock. I know he is the one who signed the contract, but to be the main event on supposedly the biggest card in mma histrory 40000 is unacceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok let me clarify on some of the points i made earlier because I think they are being taken into the wrong way.<br />
1st. SF is not anywhere near the UFC yet. But they need only offer up one thing to start making up ground on the UFC. Profit sharing. If the fights on CBS start to net big money deals than thats where the future will be. I personally souldnt mind it at all considering it would be free. Although SF would probably move over to ppv eventually.<br />
2nd. Im not saying the UFC should stop trying to make money for themselves. I would just like to see them pay these guys a higher percentage of profits. Its been said many times before but the UFC&#8217;s profit sharing with its atheletes is abissmal compared to the other major sports leagues. If the UFC spent 1 million dollars more per event on its fighters I dont think it would hurt them too much. Although I do not know the ppv averages off the top of my head.<br />
3rd. If Dan is taking this stand then I applaud him. Im not sure he is right if he is insisting on 500gs per fight, but it should prove a point. Frank Mir was paid 40000 for his fight with Brock. I know he is the one who signed the contract, but to be the main event on supposedly the biggest card in mma histrory 40000 is unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Mike</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132580</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132580</guid>
		<description>On paper Marquardt should win this, but Sonnen is a savvy, disciplined fighter.  He had the right game plan for Okami and executed it to perfection. Marquardt will try to stand and trade, and Sonnen&#039;s wrestling may help him.  Sonnen&#039;s biggest weakness is slick bjj.  Marquardt has decent submissions, but that seems to be his second choice after his striking.  A win by Sonnen wouldn&#039;t be that much of an upset to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On paper Marquardt should win this, but Sonnen is a savvy, disciplined fighter.  He had the right game plan for Okami and executed it to perfection. Marquardt will try to stand and trade, and Sonnen&#8217;s wrestling may help him.  Sonnen&#8217;s biggest weakness is slick bjj.  Marquardt has decent submissions, but that seems to be his second choice after his striking.  A win by Sonnen wouldn&#8217;t be that much of an upset to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dufresne</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132578</link>
		<dc:creator>Dufresne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132578</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-132569&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-132569&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MMA-LOGIC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Misaki, Lawler, Hendo? are top candidates surely. Aoki, Thomson, Diaz, Fedor, Overeem, Mousasi
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He didn&#039;t say they didn&#039;t have any top 10 talent, what he said was that they don&#039;t have enough talent in any one weight class. And he&#039;s right. 

Heavyweight you have Overeem, Rogers, and Fedor. Although they do have some good talent, the UFC is VERY deep in HW, so I wouldn&#039;t qualify very many of SF&#039;s fighters in the top 10 of that weight class.

LHW you have Mousasi and....? Hendo if he signs, but who else? UFC has Machida, Shogun, Evans, Griffin, etc...

MW has the most depth in my opinion. You have lawler, diaz (well, he spends some of his time here), Lindland and Kung Le. This may be the only weight class that SF has more depth than the UFC right now, but not a one of these could hang with Anderson, and to be honest I don&#039;t see many of them getting past Marquardt or even Maia.

WW You get who? Shields and Diaz maybe, but I wouldn&#039;t put either of them over GSP, Thiago Alves, Anthony Johnson (when he makes weight) or Fitch. 

LW has Thompson and Melendez. That&#039;s it. Aoki is signed with Dream, so I&#039;m not considering him. Again the UFC just has too much depth here.

As far as paying fighters more, the UFC doesn&#039;t have near the income of the bigger sports, or even as much income as some of the individual teams. People tend to forget that they were in gigantic amounts of debt until just recently. According to public reports they were still $34 million in the hole in 2004.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-132569">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-132569" rel="nofollow">MMA-LOGIC</a></strong>: Misaki, Lawler, Hendo? are top candidates surely. Aoki, Thomson, Diaz, Fedor, Overeem, Mousasi
</p></blockquote>
<p>He didn&#8217;t say they didn&#8217;t have any top 10 talent, what he said was that they don&#8217;t have enough talent in any one weight class. And he&#8217;s right. </p>
<p>Heavyweight you have Overeem, Rogers, and Fedor. Although they do have some good talent, the UFC is VERY deep in HW, so I wouldn&#8217;t qualify very many of SF&#8217;s fighters in the top 10 of that weight class.</p>
<p>LHW you have Mousasi and&#8230;.? Hendo if he signs, but who else? UFC has Machida, Shogun, Evans, Griffin, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>MW has the most depth in my opinion. You have lawler, diaz (well, he spends some of his time here), Lindland and Kung Le. This may be the only weight class that SF has more depth than the UFC right now, but not a one of these could hang with Anderson, and to be honest I don&#8217;t see many of them getting past Marquardt or even Maia.</p>
<p>WW You get who? Shields and Diaz maybe, but I wouldn&#8217;t put either of them over GSP, Thiago Alves, Anthony Johnson (when he makes weight) or Fitch. </p>
<p>LW has Thompson and Melendez. That&#8217;s it. Aoki is signed with Dream, so I&#8217;m not considering him. Again the UFC just has too much depth here.</p>
<p>As far as paying fighters more, the UFC doesn&#8217;t have near the income of the bigger sports, or even as much income as some of the individual teams. People tend to forget that they were in gigantic amounts of debt until just recently. According to public reports they were still $34 million in the hole in 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moosebaby02</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132577</link>
		<dc:creator>moosebaby02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132577</guid>
		<description>just because a old one style of fighting hendo thinks he should make more money than title holders just because he koed Bisping dosent mean he should get it. it also dosent mean that the UFC will go under. Wasnt like the UFC went under when Randy C took a little vaction did it. Also SF will not be able to pay Hendo the kind of money he wants with out taken a hughe hit in the pocket in the long run. Try marketing hendo and expect to pay him $500,000 fight. oh and everyone else on the card as well and your staff, advertiseing and so on and so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just because a old one style of fighting hendo thinks he should make more money than title holders just because he koed Bisping dosent mean he should get it. it also dosent mean that the UFC will go under. Wasnt like the UFC went under when Randy C took a little vaction did it. Also SF will not be able to pay Hendo the kind of money he wants with out taken a hughe hit in the pocket in the long run. Try marketing hendo and expect to pay him $500,000 fight. oh and everyone else on the card as well and your staff, advertiseing and so on and so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMA-LOGIC</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132569</link>
		<dc:creator>MMA-LOGIC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132569</guid>
		<description>&quot;think about as you say UFC is going to get over taken&quot; 

I didn&#039;t say that at all I said they will have to change and they have some catching up to do (network deal etc). They are &quot;over taken&quot; in a few aspects and I believe they will have to change to keep up or stay ahead. We will both have to wait and see.

&quot;In fact the only division that SF has two of the top 10 fighters in the world is HW,&quot;

Misaki, Lawler, Hendo? are top candidates surely. Aoki, Thomson, Diaz, Fedor, Overeem, Mousasi etc and they are signing quickly. This is what I&#039;m saying they are taking off and have a good relationship with Dream and M1 and also look like they are willing to deal with Sengoku. This is all more than what the UFC is doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;think about as you say UFC is going to get over taken&#8221; </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that at all I said they will have to change and they have some catching up to do (network deal etc). They are &#8220;over taken&#8221; in a few aspects and I believe they will have to change to keep up or stay ahead. We will both have to wait and see.</p>
<p>&#8220;In fact the only division that SF has two of the top 10 fighters in the world is HW,&#8221;</p>
<p>Misaki, Lawler, Hendo? are top candidates surely. Aoki, Thomson, Diaz, Fedor, Overeem, Mousasi etc and they are signing quickly. This is what I&#8217;m saying they are taking off and have a good relationship with Dream and M1 and also look like they are willing to deal with Sengoku. This is all more than what the UFC is doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dpk</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132568</link>
		<dc:creator>dpk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132568</guid>
		<description>The fact is that this is a fight between two top 10 MWs, which is more than you can say for the SF MW title fight that we just saw.  In fact the only division that SF has two of the top 10 fighters in the world is HW, just something to think about as you say UFC is going to get over taken.  I think Nate will win, but it will be a challenge and it will help keep him sharp for his title shot sometime this summer.  

I&#039;m really sick of people telling UFC they don&#039;t pay fighters enough, when they pay the majority of their fighters more than any other organization that stays in business can.  Just because some fighters think they are worth more than UFC thinks they are doesn&#039;t make Dana and Lorenzo idiots, that is how they have stayed in business while Bodog, Affliction, Pride, and IFL went away.  We have also seen in the last year, the pay scale of UFC rise, and that is a trend that I doubt will stop anytime soon.  Guys in their first fight with UFC used to make ($3000/$3000) now the lowest I&#039;ve seen in a while is ($7000/$7000), which is a lot more than guys at that level would make in most other orgs.  Oh yeah, and when was the last time UFC cancelled a fight between two healthy, hometown fighters the night of the fight, causing the guys to lose any chance at a win bonus, and all their sponsor ship money?  Oh yeah, that was Strikeforce, good way to treat the fighters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is that this is a fight between two top 10 MWs, which is more than you can say for the SF MW title fight that we just saw.  In fact the only division that SF has two of the top 10 fighters in the world is HW, just something to think about as you say UFC is going to get over taken.  I think Nate will win, but it will be a challenge and it will help keep him sharp for his title shot sometime this summer.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m really sick of people telling UFC they don&#8217;t pay fighters enough, when they pay the majority of their fighters more than any other organization that stays in business can.  Just because some fighters think they are worth more than UFC thinks they are doesn&#8217;t make Dana and Lorenzo idiots, that is how they have stayed in business while Bodog, Affliction, Pride, and IFL went away.  We have also seen in the last year, the pay scale of UFC rise, and that is a trend that I doubt will stop anytime soon.  Guys in their first fight with UFC used to make ($3000/$3000) now the lowest I&#8217;ve seen in a while is ($7000/$7000), which is a lot more than guys at that level would make in most other orgs.  Oh yeah, and when was the last time UFC cancelled a fight between two healthy, hometown fighters the night of the fight, causing the guys to lose any chance at a win bonus, and all their sponsor ship money?  Oh yeah, that was Strikeforce, good way to treat the fighters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMA-LOGIC</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132566</link>
		<dc:creator>MMA-LOGIC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132566</guid>
		<description>I agree that this match up is a not that inspiring. I would like to see how Silva would do against Chonnen but Marquadt should win this and if not it will be by grind out.

jgrose enough money is enough to keep them going elsewhere to get more $$$. The UFC has the fighters signed to exclusive contracts, tells them what they can and can&#039;t do to a degree that fighters just wont put up with unless they get compensated adequately, I mean it  is the richest MMA org but is losing top fighters like Jolie and Maddonna are adopting kids and then replacing them with TUF fighters and B grade personalities. The UFC must change to suite the new MMA climate. The only question is how much will they change. I personally think they have made some bad decisions recently. 1 of those bad decisions was letting the likes of Arlovski, Sylvia, Hendo and Babalu go and signing guys like Kimbo and Baroni  etc. I mean Dana said Kimbo was shit then says he can only get to the UFC via TUF series and then after he loses his first fight in TUF he brings him in anyway???? It seems he didn&#039;t have to win the series or even 1 fight he just had to ...have a bad beard and gold teeth. Bad form Dana, you say that &quot;the UFC has the best fighters period&quot; but Baroni and Kimbo are b grade at best. The 2nd f#ck up is not signing Fedor  and the 3rd blunder was not securing a network deal. I think the true significance of Strikeforces event on Saturday is not yet known but I think Dana is starting to have a sick feeling deep down in his stomach. I don&#039;t think the horse has bolted but the UFC, like it once did with Pride, has some catching up to do in more than 1 respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this match up is a not that inspiring. I would like to see how Silva would do against Chonnen but Marquadt should win this and if not it will be by grind out.</p>
<p>jgrose enough money is enough to keep them going elsewhere to get more $$$. The UFC has the fighters signed to exclusive contracts, tells them what they can and can&#8217;t do to a degree that fighters just wont put up with unless they get compensated adequately, I mean it  is the richest MMA org but is losing top fighters like Jolie and Maddonna are adopting kids and then replacing them with TUF fighters and B grade personalities. The UFC must change to suite the new MMA climate. The only question is how much will they change. I personally think they have made some bad decisions recently. 1 of those bad decisions was letting the likes of Arlovski, Sylvia, Hendo and Babalu go and signing guys like Kimbo and Baroni  etc. I mean Dana said Kimbo was shit then says he can only get to the UFC via TUF series and then after he loses his first fight in TUF he brings him in anyway???? It seems he didn&#8217;t have to win the series or even 1 fight he just had to &#8230;have a bad beard and gold teeth. Bad form Dana, you say that &#8220;the UFC has the best fighters period&#8221; but Baroni and Kimbo are b grade at best. The 2nd f#ck up is not signing Fedor  and the 3rd blunder was not securing a network deal. I think the true significance of Strikeforces event on Saturday is not yet known but I think Dana is starting to have a sick feeling deep down in his stomach. I don&#8217;t think the horse has bolted but the UFC, like it once did with Pride, has some catching up to do in more than 1 respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xtreme_machine</title>
		<link>http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2009/11/09/nate-marquardt-vs-chael-sonnen-set-for-ufc-110/comment-page-1/#comment-132564</link>
		<dc:creator>xtreme_machine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveouncesofpain.com/?p=18750#comment-132564</guid>
		<description>people get OVER it 

Hendo is not coming back to the UFC 

Dana said it in an interview 

so relax and look forward to Mousasi vs Henderson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people get OVER it </p>
<p>Hendo is not coming back to the UFC </p>
<p>Dana said it in an interview </p>
<p>so relax and look forward to Mousasi vs Henderson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

